MongoDB Vs MySQL
Earlier, organizations that require a relational database opted for MySQL. However, with the increase in the data volume, non-relational databases (such as MongoDB) have become popular among organizations as it caters to the requirements of our fluid data. Today there is stiff competition in the market between the newbie and the veteran (MongoDB vs MySQL). Entrepreneurs often find it difficult to choose the right kind of database for their business. In this blog, we will understand the key differences between MongoDB and MySQL that will help you to decide the most suitable database for your business.
Difference Between MongoDB and MySQL
- Database Structure
MongoDB stores data in the form of JSON documents varying in structure. It enhances the query speed by storing the related data sets together that can then be accessed using the MongoDB query language. This database allows developers to create documents without defining the document structure. MongoDB is used by organizations such as Twitter, Sony, Foursquare, and Klout.
MySQL database stores data values in tables and can access these values using SQL. It uses the schema to define the database structure. In the schema, rows of the table must have the same structures and their values must be represented by specific data types. MySQL is used by organizations such as YouTube, PayPal, NASA, and Pinterest.
- Index Optimization
Although both MongoDB and MySQL use indexes to find data rapidly, their approach differs when the index is not defined or not found. In MongoDB, when the index is not found, each document is scanned to select the document that matches the query statement.
In MySQL, when the index is not defined, the entire table is scanned by database engines to find the relevant rows.
- Database Deployment
- Type of Replication/Clustering
MongoDB supports built-in replication, auto-elections, and sharding. Auto-elections helps developers to set a secondary database. If the primary database fails, the secondary database is elected automatically. Sharding enables horizontal scaling (hard to implement in MySQL).
MySQL supports the master-slave replication and master-master replication. The multi-source replication allows replication from multiple masters parallely.
MongoDB offers Enterprise-Grade Support that extends beyond the break/fix model. It provides 24X7 support along with an extended lifecycle support add-on. This helps to upgrade to a newer version at your own pace.
MySQL provides Oracle Lifetime Support at three different levels – Premier (for 1-5yrs old versions), Extended (for 6-8 yrs old versions), and Sustain (for more than 9yrs old versions). Each level provides 24X7 tech support having access to the entire knowledge base, updates, patches, bug fixes, and maintenance releases.
- Developer Productivity
MongoDB works with data (i.e., flexible JSON documents) that speeds up the development cycle by four to five times. MongoDB naturally documents the map to the object-oriented languages that simplify the visualization of how the application data is mapped to data in the database.
MySQL uses a rigid table structure model due to which it takes much time to create applications.
MongoDB uses a single document to store the data for an entity and thus, makes applications faster. It facilitates developers to read and write data all in one place.
In the MySQL database, the data spread across different tables which means multiple tables are accessed to read and write the data. This helps to lower the speed of the application.
- Atomic Transactions
The MongoDB 4.0 version added the support for multi-document transactions that made it a powerful open-source database in unstructured space. Although there are some limitations in terms of unsupportable operations, MongoDB is still a major boon for developers.
MySQL database supports atomic transactions i.e., multiple operations inside a transaction.
- Distributed System
MongoDB is completely built on a distributed architecture i.e., it offers data localization using automatic sharding and replica sets to maintain “always-on” availability. This makes the data globally available when it is kept locally for low latency access and governance.
MySQL is not developed on any distributed system architecture. A new distributed database (MySQL Cluster) is added in the MySQL offerings.
- Native Language Drivers
MongoDB is better than MySQL as its drivers and APIs are native to the developer’s programming language.
Although MySQL has JSON support, developers have to interact with the JSON data using multi-layer SQL functionality.
|Data Structure||Schema definition not required||Structured data with clear schema|
|Use Case||IoT, content management, real-time analytics, mobile applications||Legacy applications or accounting systems (apps requiring multiple row transactions)|
|Risk||Low risk of attack due to design||Risk of SQL injection attacks|
|Analysis||Good for unstructured and/or structured data having potential for rapid growth||Good for structured data, requiring a traditional relational database|
Both MongoDB and MySQL have their benefits and limitations. You can simply choose MySQL for your organization if you have to support a legacy application or your data requires multiple row transactions. However, MongoDB is worth considering in case you need a more flexible schema-free solution for your unstructured data.
May 19, 2020
May 12, 2020